ext_173297 ([identity profile] taobear.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] growler_south 2005-02-15 11:01 am (UTC)

Well...as for #1 - technically, I never said you weren't available before now in that respect, nor did I state explicitly that your 'availability' were necessarily any different than it had been previouly, but the post was certainly made more humorous by taking advantage of the ambiguity of the term "available" therefore implying "for a relationship"*
and as for #2 - I actually knew this, and expecting you to correct me in this manner allows me to say something witty like, "You're not even on a continent?!? That's even worse! No wonder I keep losing your signal...I just figured it was having trouble keeping up with all the constant movement from one sweaty, grunt-filled pigsex encounter to another...On another odd note, the little bleeps playing everytime you move are playing 'Get It Get It' by the scissor sisters."

*Please note that the term 'relationship' is even more ambiguous than the term 'available'...thereby proving the hypothesis that the English language is in fact incapable of ever expressing anything with certainty - or so it's thought...

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting